Do you believe New York State should give drivers licenses to non documented people?

Do you believe New York State should give drivers licenses to non documented people?

Yes and this is why. TAKE A CLOSE LOOK AT 51. The issue is whether this Sovereign Man is required to obey the provisions in the Motor Vehicle Code/statutes of the 50 united States of America. It is the contention of this Sovereign Man that because he is a Free and Natural Man and not an artificial creation of government who has given up none of his RIGHTS, that the Motor Vehicle Code/statutes do not apply to him. It is also the contention of this Sovereign Man that traveling upon the streets, highways and byways in the 50 united States of America by this Sovereign Man is an unalienable RIGHT. Being this, is not subject to regulation or legislation by the States'- legislative bodies.2. Let us first consider the contention of this Sovereign Man that traveling upon the streets or highways in America is a RIGHT. Various courts have ruled on this issue. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled:2.1 The RIGHT to travel is a part of the liberty of which the Citizen cannot be deprived without due process of the law under the 5th Amendment. (Emphasis added). See: Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 125.3. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin stated in 1909:3.1 The term "-public highway,"- in its broad popular sense, includes toll roads--any road which the public have a RIGHT to use even conditionally, though in a strict legal sense it is restricted to roads which are wholly public. (Emphasis added). See: Weirich v. State, 140 Wis. 98.4. The Supreme Court of the State of Illinois ruled:4.1 Even the legislature has no power to deny to a Citizen the RIGHT to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of his business or pleasure, though this RIGHT might be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. (Emphasis added). See: Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 N.E. 22.5. "-Regulated"- here can only mean traffic safety enforcement, stop lights, sign, etc. NOT a privilege that requires permission, i.e.- licensing, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, etc..6.PRIVILEGE OR RIGHT?6.1 The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is NOT a mere PRIVILEGE, but a COMMON AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived. (Emphasis added). See: Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, supra- Ligare v. Chicago, 28 N.E. 934- Boone v. Clark, 214 S.W. 607- American Jurisprudence 1st Ed., Highways § 163.6.2 Citizen'-s RIGHT to travel upon public highways includes RIGHT to use usual conveyances of time, including horse-drawn carriage, or automobile, for ordinary purposes of life and business. (Emphasis added). See: Thompson v. Smith (Chief of Police), 154 S.E. 579, 580.6.3 The RIGHT of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a COMMON RIGHT which he has under the RIGHT to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. (Emphasis added). See: Thompson v. Smith, supra.7. It could not be stated more Conclusively that a Sovereign Man in the 50 united States of America has a RIGHT to travel, without approval or restriction, (license), and that this RIGHT is protected under the U.S. Constitution. After all, who do the streets, highways, roadways and waterways belong to anyway? The People-At-Large! The 50 States and the federal government are only stewards of the People'-s Property! Here are other court decisions that expound the same facts:7.1 . . . [T]he streets and highways belong to the public, for the use of the public in the ordinary and customary manner. See: Hadfield v. Lundin, 98 Wn. 657- 168 P. 516.7.2 All those who travel upon, and transport their property upon, the public highways, using the ordinary conveyance of today, and doing so in the usual and ordinary course of life and business. See: Hadfield, supra- State v. City of Spokane, 109 Wn. 360- 186 P. 864.7.3 The RIGHT of the Citizen to travel upon the highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, differs radically and obviously from that of one who makes the highways his place of business and uses it for private gain . . . . (Emphasis added). See: State v. City of Spokane, supra.7.4 . . . [F]or while a Citizen has the RIGHT to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that RIGHT does not extend to the use of the highways, either in whole or in part, as a place of business for private gain. For the latter purposes no person has a vested right to use the highways of the state, but is a MERE PRIVILEGE or license which the legislature may grant or withhold at its discretion.... (Emphasis added). See: Hadfield, supra- State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073- Cummins v. Jones, 155 P. 171- Packard v. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 257, 264 U.S. 140 and other cases too numerous to mention.http://www.landrights.com/Travel.htmhttp://www.landrights.com/

Speedfreak

No, NEVER.

Maria

No.. Absolutely not.

MR

No.. Absolutely not.

Deborah

this is a sore subject for me. first to answer your question absolutely not. now on to the part that ticks me off I have been seizure free for 21 years but yet I can't get my drivers license back because of ny states policies, but yet they allow the neighbors grandson to drive and he is bi polar and schizophrenic and refuses to take his meds. needless to say he is out in never never-land, is a danger to himself and others on the road and really should be in assisted living. does something seem odd about this policy.that's new york state for you.

Jan

Nope. No state should give a license to those who are here illegally.

Ask

insurance

Popular Q&A

Is there a special type of auto insurance for college students whom only drive while at home on vacation?
I agree with the other person regarding some insurance companies can stop and start your insurance on demand.I think I did this back when I was in college (that was a long time ago!). Basically I had to call up the insurance company and tell them when I needed coverage and when I needed to...

Was convicted of a dui and now have a motorcycle do i need insurance?
An SR-22 isn't a type of insurance coverage, but rather proof that you have insurance.It is notification from your insurance company to the DMV that you have auto liability insurance in effect in the State of California which satisfies the minimum insurance coverage required by the State.This...

How much is a back windshield replacement going to cost?
try the phone book under auto glass call three places many will come to you now days and its not high as it once was... 150 buck or so.. jst had couple done one was dodge van front 165.. one on a ford 150

How much does it cost to add a 16 year old female driver to an auto insurance policy?
On average a person pays 120-150$ per month. However there are many factors directly affecting cost insurance of your car , Which need to be addressed to give you true benefits. Car insurances can vary dramatically in price so read on to learn how to buy car insurance that is affordable for...

My auto insurance lapsed for one year due to unemployment. Can I get insurance in Ontario now? Where?
Yes you can get auto insurance again. In fact as long as you were insured for at least a year and were not cancelled by the insurance company (i.e. you were the one who properly cancelled the policy), then no insurance company in Ontario can rate for the lapse of insurance. However if I were...